The Canine Chronicle dot
dot
Home : The Canine Chronicle
Contact
Subscribe to the Canine Chronicle Today!
Search
EditorialStatisticsBest In Show ClubAdvertisingCommunity
Editorial


THE CANINE CHRONICLE ®
All rights reserved.
Copyright© 2008

Publisher/Editor
Tom Grabe

k9chron@aol.com


4727 NW 80th Ave.
Ocala, FL 34482
352.369.1104 [Tel]
352.369.1108 [Fax]


 


 

 

 

The Hound Group lssue: May - 2008

Arbitrary. Webster’s Dictionary defines this word as: “depending on individual discretion (as of a judge) and not fixed by law”; or “existing or coming about seemingly at random or by chance or as a capricious and unreasonable act of will.”

Now that we have defined the word, let’s discuss the arbitrary nature in which those who rule our sport choose to mete out punishment to those competing, judging or in any other way participating in it.

Even though the Rules of Misconduct manual seems to spell out the offenses for which one can be expelled from the ranks of AKC while also providing specific punishment for these offenses, it seems that in many cases who you are is more important than what you’ve done. It is not uncommon to see an exhibitor or judge break a rule and go unpunished while another may commit the same infraction and have the book thrown at him or her.

Judges are governed by a similar set of rules and guidelines. For the most part, these are spelled out to them in the Rules, Policies and Guidelines for Conformation Dog Show Judges. They are also given instructions regarding the physical requirements to judge. Specifically, the manual says, “It is essential that a dog show judge be physically capable of performing the functions necessary to properly judge dogs.” They then list numerous physical requirements for their approved judges.

I have no problem with these requirements and I believe that judges should be physically capable of performing their assigned task. However, it again seems that the enforcement of these rules is arbitrary and, some say, punitive. I have had calls from judges who have been instructed to “take a hiatus” or “take emeritus status”. The overtone is that they would like these judges to just go away. The general review of each judge (by AKC) was that they were not capable of judging anymore.

The interesting thing to me is that I have witnessed other judges who have been every bit as physically incapable of judging as those mentioned previously yet they were not only allowed to continue judging, some were actually allowed to judge at some of the most prestigious shows in the country. Which of us has not seen a judge who could not bend over to inspect dogs in the group for fear of falling, or seen a judge who was seemingly lost when making the cut in a group? Where was the AKC then? Did those judges get a call or letter asking them to take a break or quit?

I have recently seen judges who could not function well due to recent illnesses yet they are still judging regularly. Some are recovering; others are not. The point is that, in my opinion, what’s fair for one should be fair for all. Arbitrary enforcement of the rules upon some judges or exhibitors, but not all, is bad policy that disenfranchises those within the fancy and it irreparably damages the sport.

 

T.G.

• • • • •

 

 

:: May 2008 Issue ::

Multiple All Breed Best In Show & Multiple Best In Specialty Show
#1 Pointer All Breed and Breed* · #2 Herding Dog*

Ch. Cordmaker Field Of Dreams

One of America's Tog Dogs Amongst All Breeds*

CS_CONRAD CONRAD
 

If there was such a thing as pedigreed canine royalty, Conrad would certainly fit that description. Descending from a long line of top winning Pulik – most notably his sire, Ch. Cordmaker Mississippi Mud - “Amish” who is the top winning Puli of all time – Conrad is blazing a trail of his own marked by numerous All Breed Best in Shows as well as Best In Specialty Show at the 2007 Puli Club of America National Specialty.

2007 marked a great start for Conrad as he finished the year as the #1 Puli and #6 Herding Dog. He has started off 2008 by climbing the ranks to #2 Herding Dog*, #1 Puli* and has found himself amongst the Top 20 Dogs of All Breeds*.

Conrad’s multiple Best in Show and Best in Specialty Show wins are a testament to his true Puli type, outstanding movement, and a temperament that commands the attention of everyone in his midst.

Owners Jackie Beaudoin and Sue Huebner have proudly owned many of the top Pulik in the U.S. for the past decade. Conrad is the latest offering from this dynamic team.

The future of this young dog seems limitless. We look forward to the rest of 2008 and the challenges it presents.


*CC/Royal Canin All Breed & Breed Systems, 04/5/08 Issue